Dr. Gustin's Blog

Medical Expert Witnesses Approved in Avandia Lawsuits

Details

Published: Sunday, 30 January 2011 14:04

US District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has recently ruled that three plaintiffs' medical expert witnesses meet the Daubert standard for scientific validity in Avandia lawsuits currently before the court. Avandia lawsuits are numerous, with some 3,500 cases filed in California state courts, and 1,200 in Pennsylvania, with all but 250 of those having been settled with GlaxoSmithKline – the maker of the diabetes medication.

The allegation with Avandia is that the drug can cause pathologic bone fractures, stroke, liver damage, and a myriad array of heart disorders that can result in a permanent disability or death.

Code of Ethics for Expert Witnesses

Details

Published: Sunday, 02 January 2011 16:22

Recently, I came across a useful code of ethics proposal for expert witnesses on an expert services website (IME) which was carefully thought out and crafted.  It should stimulate some interested discussion.  Please see below.

Read more ...

Medical Malpractice: Failure to Diagnose Cancer

Details

Published: Monday, 27 December 2010 18:43

One of the most frequent medical malpractice issues is the failure to timely diagnose and treat cancer.  An issue that comes up in each case is how much damage was caused by the failure to timely diagnose the malignancy? Unlike a surgical or medication error which can be directly caused by a careless health care provider, cancer is usually not caused by the physician involved in the patient’s care.  In most instances the presence of cancer is the unfortunate consequence of nature.

Read more ...

Selecting an Medical Expert Witness: What should an attorney look for?

Details

Published: Tuesday, 14 December 2010 20:35

Credibility is a key attribute in a medical expert witness, every trial lawyer would agree. The medical expert must come across as experienced, well-informed, sincere, and believable.  But how is this credibility determined when first seeking which experts to use on any given matter? What attributes provide the best predictors of how the expert will measure up in the eyes of a jury?

Read more ...

What Is the Key Factor When Hiring a Medical Expert?

Details

Published: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 10:15

When hiring an expert, the most important quality to look for is someone who presents well.  Assess how he speaks, how he appears, and his degree of comfort with himself and his area of expertise.  If it is not possible to meet with him before hiring him, then ask for several references from attorneys for whom he has testified.  This is because, as a rule, jurors will tend to believe a medical expert who presents and appears well.  Of course, the content of his testimony is crucial too, but if this information cannot be conveyed properly, it will difficult for a medical expert to succeed.  The medical expert can have spotless credentials and plenty of experience, but if, for whatever reason, he does not present well to a jury, the jury may focus on the absence of those qualities and never really hear the testimony.

Read more ...

Are Attorneys Liable for their Expert's Opinions?

Details

Published: Thursday, 18 November 2010 10:21

When expert witnesses are targeted for malpractice by the attorney's client, can experts turn and sue the attorney who hired them?  A California appeals court has ruled that they can.

Read more ...

When Medical Experts Switch Sides in Medical-Legal Cases

Details

Published: Wednesday, 03 November 2010 22:39

May a medical expert witness switch sides in a lawsuit? Unlike the lawyers in a case, no rule expressly stops a medical expert from "hopping the fence." After all, the conventional wisdom is that the expert's allegiance is to the truth, not to any one party. But just because an expert has the opportunity to switch sides doesn't necessarily make it the right thing to do. Switching sides can have adverse consequences. For one, the expert could be disqualified. For another, the lawyer could be sanctioned. And if either of those happens, the medical malpractice case could be nonsuited.

Read more ...

Fosamax Causes Femur Fractures: A spate of Medical-legal lawsuits

Details

Published: Friday, 29 October 2010 00:28

Last week, the FDA finally forced the drug maker of Fosamax, an osteoporosis drug, to add a warning about the risk of a Fosamax thigh bone fracture.  Doctors who continue to prescribe Fosamax are continuing to expose themselves to medical malpractice lawsuits.

Fosamax (alendronate sodium) is a popular medication prescribed to treat osteoporosis and reduce the risk of fractures by preventing bone turn-over. However, side effects of Fosamax have been linked to decay of the jaw bone, known as osteonecrosis of the jaw, and reports of low-energy femur fractures, typically occurring with falls from standing height or less.

Read more ...

Is More Medical Legal Tort Reform Necessary?

Details

Published: Monday, 18 October 2010 10:50

Many people both in medicine and in law talk incessantly about the need to enact aggressive tort reform to protect the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries from "frivolous" lawsuits.  This they claim will also short-circuit healthcare costs that are spiraling out of control.  Regarding protecting industries from unwarranted lawsuits, is this correct?

Read more ...